Timing of surgery and elective perioperative management of patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of surgery and perioperative management of patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection are open issues. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the patient with previous Sars-CoV-2 infection to undergo elective surgery. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's surgical process. METHODS: The Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected 11 experts to reach a consensus on key aspects of this theme in adult and pediatric population. The methods of this process document were in accordance to the principles of rapid review of the scientific literature and modified Delphi method. The experts produced statements and supporting reasons in the form of an informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to a vote in order to express the degree of consent. RESULTS: Patients should not undergo elective surgery within 7 weeks of infection unless there is the risk of a negative evolution of the disease. To mitigate the risk of postsurgical mortality, a multidisciplinary approach seemed useful in addition to the use of validated algorithms to estimate the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality; the risk related to SARS-CoV-2 infection should be added. The risk of potential nosocomial contagion from a positive patients should also be considered when deciding to proceed with surgery. Most of the evidence came from previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, so the evidence should be considered indirect. CONCLUSION: A balanced preoperative multidisciplinary risk-benefit evaluation is needed in patients with previous infection by SARS-CoV-2 for elective surgery.

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid characteristics and outcomes of invasively mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Genoa, Italy.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the study is to describe the cellular characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation; the secondary outcome is to describe BALF findings between survivors vs non-survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR, admitted to ICU between March and April 2020 were enrolled. At ICU admission, BALF were analyzed by flow cytometry. Univariate, multivariate and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, median age of 64 years (IQR 58-69). The majority cells in the BALF were neutrophils (70%, IQR 37.5-90.5) and macrophages (27%, IQR 7-49) while a minority were lymphocytes, 1%, TCD3+ 92% (IQR 82-95). The ICU mortality was 32.8%. Non-survivors had a significantly older age (p = 0.033) and peripheral lymphocytes (p = 0.012) were lower compared to the survivors. At multivariate analysis the percentage of macrophages in the BALF correlated with poor outcome (OR 1.336, CI95% 1.014-1.759, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, BALF cellularity is mainly composed of neutrophils and macrophages. The macrophages percentage in the BALF at ICU admittance correlated with higher ICU mortality. The lack of lymphocytes in BALF could partly explain a reduced anti-viral response.

Airway management in anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a "real life" observational study.

BACKGROUND: One-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic anesthesia is required to provide good surgical exposure. OLV is commonly achieved through a double lumen tube (DLT) or a bronchial blocker (BB). Malposition is a relevant issue related to these devices use. No prospective studies with adequately large sample size have been performed to evaluate the malposition rate of DLTs and BBs. METHODS: A total of 2,127 patients requiring OLV during thoracic surgery were enrolled. The aim of this multicenter prospective observational study performed across 26 academic and community hospitals is to evaluate intraoperative malposition rate of DLTs and BBs. We also aim to assess: which device is the most used to achieve OLV, the frequency of bronchoscope (BRO) use, the incidence rate of desaturation during OLV and the role of other factors that can correlate to this event, and incidence of difficult airway. RESULTS: Malposition rate for DLTs was 14%, for BBs 33%. DLTs were used in 95% of patients and BBs in 5%. Mean positioning time was shorter for DLT than BB (156±230 vs. 321±290 s). BRO was used in 54% of patients to check the correct positioning of the DLT. Desaturation occurred in 20% of all cases during OLV achieved through a DLT. Predicting factors of desaturation were dislocation (OR 2.03) and big size of DLT (OR 1.15). BRO use (OR 0.69) and left surgical side (OR 0.41) proved to be protective factors. Difficult airway prevalence was 16%; 10.8% predicted and 5.2% unpredicted. CONCLUSIONS: DLT has a low malpositioning rate and is the preferred device to achieve OLV. BRO use recorded was unexpectedly low. The possibility of encountering a difficult airway is frequent, with an overall prevalence of 16%. Risk factors of desaturation are malposition and increased size of DLT. Left procedures and BRO use could lead to fewer episodes of desaturation.

Individualized, perioperative, hemodynamic goal-directed therapy in major abdominal surgery (iPEGASUS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery is high, especially in patients who are at risk of complications and undergoing major surgery. We hypothesize that perioperative, algorithm-driven, hemodynamic therapy based on individualized fluid status and cardiac output optimization is able to reduce mortality and postoperative moderate and severe complications as a major determinant of the patients' postoperative quality of life, as well as health care costs. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-center, international, prospective, randomized trial in 380 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery including visceral, urological, and gynecological operations. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to two treatment arms within the participating centers. Patients of the intervention group will be treated perioperatively following a specific hemodynamic therapy algorithm based on pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and individualized optimization of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis (ProAQT© device; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany). Patients in the control group will be treated according to standard local care based on established basic hemodynamic treatment. The primary endpoint is a composite comprising the occurrence of moderate or severe postoperative complications or death within 28 days post surgery. Secondary endpoints are: (1) the number of moderate and severe postoperative complications in total, per patient and for each individual complication; (2) the occurrence of at least one of these complications on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 28 in total and for every complication; (3) the days alive and free of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy and renal replacement therapy, length of intensive care unit, and hospital stay at day 7 and day 28; and (4) mortality and quality of life, assessed by the EQ-5D-5L™ questionnaire, after 6 months. DISCUSSION: This is a large, international randomized controlled study evaluating the effect of perioperative, individualized, algorithm-driven ,hemodynamic optimization on postoperative morbidity and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: NCT03021525 . Registered on 12 January 2017.

Continuous epidural versus wound infusion plus single morphine bolus as postoperative analgesia in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared a bundle of interventions including wound infiltration and continuous infusion with local anesthetics plus a single morphine bolus (CWI-M) with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) as postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Fifty-one adults undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were randomized in this non-inferiority open-label trial. In the CEI group, patients received thoracic epidural levobupivacaine 0.12% plus sufentanil 0.4 µg/mL infusion for 48 hours. In the CWI-M group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL levobupivacaine 0.5%, patients received a morphine bolus before the end of anesthesia and levobupivacaine 0.25% infusion through two multi-holed pre-peritoneal catheters for 48 hours. Systemic morphine was administered as rescue in both groups. The primary endpoint was the mean Numeric Rating Scale score in the first 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Mean NRS was 1.7 (95% CI: from 1.2 to 2.2) in the CEI and 2.2 (95% CI: from 1.7 to 2.7) in the CWI-M group, the 90% CI of difference was from -0.1 to 1.1, not including the non-inferiority margin of 1.3. The cumulative rescue morphine dose per patient was higher in CWI-M than in CEI group (3.7±4.4 vs. 0.8±2.4 mg, P=0.006); moreover, NRS at arousal was higher in CWI-M (P=0.003). No differences were observed in postoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery-related outcomes, length of stay nor complications. CONCLUSIONS: CWI-M was comparable to CEI in in postoperative pain control, but it was associated with higher need of rescue systemic opiates and with a worse early pain control.

Changes in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters during low-dose propofol sedation in combination with regional anesthesia for herniorrhaphy and genitourinary surgery in children.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous vs mechanical ventilation during propofol sedation has been a subject of debate. We evaluated the safety of low-dose propofol sedation as an adjunct to regional anesthesia during herniorrhaphy and genitourinary surgery in infants and children. METHODS: The study was conducted in a prospective, nonrandomized manner using a consecutive sample of 62 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I patients between 5 months to 11 years of age in the surgery unit of an urban University Hospital. Propofol sedation (4-8 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) continuous infusion) was used with regional anesthesia (caudal, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve or penile block with 0.2-0.375% ropivacaine). All children were spontaneously breathing without an anesthesia circuit. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were continuously recorded on all patients. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements was used to analyze changes in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters during the procedure. RESULTS: Spontaneous ventilation was maintained in all patients with minimal changes in hemodynamic parameters. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and P(E)CO(2) remained stable throughout the study period: 23/62 (37%) patients exhibited signs of developing intrinsic endexpiratory pressure (PEEPi) or the presence of PEEPi because of progressive reduction of expiratory time. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose propofol sedation in combination with regional anesthesia for elective herniorrhaphy and genitourinary surgery in children maintains spontaneous ventilation and has minimal effects on hemodynamic parameters for sedation lasting <1 h. The presence of PEEPi is a relative contraindication to the use of this regimen in children with asthma or history of upper airway infections.